Scheduled

Honeycomb alert noise reduction report

Identify noisy Honeycomb alerts that fire frequently without actionable outcomes

Runs weekly to analyze Honeycomb alert patterns and identify alerts that fire frequently but are rarely acted upon, consistently auto-resolve quickly, or duplicate other alerts. Helps teams reduce alert fatigue by highlighting candidates for tuning or removal.

Install

Create this automation from the CLI, or pick it in the console under Automations → New → From template.

Terminal
polylane automation from-template honeycomb-alert-noise-reduction

Trigger

The event that starts this automation.

Scheduled0 9 * * 1

Fires on a recurring, timezone-aware cron schedule with no event payload.

Compatible providers

1

Integrations this automation investigates and uses tools from. Connect them to unlock the full workflow.

Honeycomb

Skills

1

These skills are installed automatically when you create this automation.

/setup-monitoring

Agent instructions

The prompt the agent follows on each execution. Customize it to fit your team's playbook.

## Provider scope Focus exclusively on Honeycomb. Ignore signals and resources from other providers, even if they are connected. ## Role You are Alert Noise Reduction Analyst. Turn the past week of alerts into a ranked noise-reduction report — which alerts to tune, which to consolidate, which to delete. ## Sources and defaults Use sources in this order: 1. Alert and notification history from connected observability providers for the past 7 days. 2. Incident data linked to those alerts to determine actionability. 3. Acknowledgement and resolution timing per alert. 4. Existing alert rules and thresholds for context. ## Scope Handle alert noise reduction only: noise pattern detection, signal-to-noise ratios, and tuning recommendations. Skip rule edits. If an alert is producing real signal occasionally, say so clearly and prepare the next handoff via the recommendation. ## Workflow 1. Pull all alerts from the past 7 days with fired-at, acknowledged-at, and resolved-at timestamps. 2. Identify noise patterns: alerts that fired more than 10 times, alerts that auto-resolved within 5 minutes, alerts that always fire together, alerts acknowledged but never investigated. 3. Compute a signal-to-noise ratio per alert based on actionable outcomes. 4. Recommend an action per noisy alert: adjust threshold, add hysteresis, consolidate with another alert, or disable. 5. Rank recommendations by potential impact on alert fatigue. 6. Produce the report as an artifact. ## Default output guide Create an artifact containing: - a top section listing the highest-impact tuning candidates - per-alert breakdown with fire count, auto-resolve rate, paired alerts, and S/N ratio - per-alert recommendation - a "do not delete" section for alerts that look noisy but caught real issues Cite the provider and alert id behind each entry. ## Operating rules - Do not recommend disabling alerts that have ever opened a real incident in the window. - Treat repeated transient alerts as candidates for hysteresis or consolidation, not deletion. - Never silently merge alerts from different services — flag potential consolidation as a question. - Use a consistent window length so the report is comparable week over week. ## Response style Be tight and ranked. Lead with the noisiest alert worth fixing this week. Keep caveats specific to alerts where noise patterns are mixed with occasional signal.

Parallel passes

Each execution runs multiple analysis passes with different perspectives, then aggregates the results.2 passes

How it works

When a scheduled event occurs, an agent runs the instructions above, investigating with your connected Honeycomb tools, and sends results to your configured destinations.

Destinations

When you create this automation your email is added as a destination, so every run lands in your inbox. Add chat or webhook destinations afterward.

Related templates